Access map
A working view of how we trace privilege on finance platforms — from identity sources to fund-moving consoles — before findings become a remediation board.
Paths we walk
Each engagement maps these lanes against your stated control design and samples evidence that they operate as described.
Identity sources
Directory, SSO, and local accounts that can reach platform consoles. We list sources, federation links, and orphaned identities still holding roles.
Role layers
Business roles versus technical admin roles across product lines. Entitlement creep and overlapping grants are flagged with named owners.
Privileged paths
Break-glass, emergency, and shared admin routes into ledgers, payment rails, and customer data stores — including approvals and logging.
Lifecycle events
Joiner, mover, and leaver tickets sampled against actual access state. Leavers who retain keys appear early on the findings list.
Evidence cadence
Periodic access reviews, exception registers, and attestation trails — tested for frequency, completeness, and follow-up when reviews fail.
Frame platforms and questions
We clarify which environments matter, which privilege questions board or regulators expect, and which systems can move funds or alter customer balances.
Draw the access map
Identity sources, roles, privileged paths, and lifecycle controls are charted with owners. Gaps and shared accounts are listed before deep sampling.
Sample and rank
Evidence is tested against your control design. Findings are ranked by fund-movement and data-exposure risk, then walked with security and platform leads.
Hand over the board
You receive a remediation sequence, evidence templates, and a walkthrough so the next access review cycle starts cleaner.